JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 26, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Fredy Plutarco Sánchez Palacios Vs. Universidad De Pamplona

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Suscitado Entre El Juzgado 1 Promiscuo De Familia De Pamplona, El Juzgado 4 Penal Del Circuito De Bucaramanga, El Juzgado 14 Civil Municipal De Bucaramanga Y El Juzgado 6 Administrativo De Cali. Se Resolvió Remitir El Expediente De La Referencia Al Juzgado 6 Administrativo Del Circuito De Cali Para Que Tramite Y Decida La Acción En Cuestión.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Universidad De Pamplona
  • Competencia jueces del circuito o con categoría de tales
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Remitir el expediente de la referencia, por intermedio de la Secretaria General, al Juzgado 6deg Administrativo del Circuito de Cali, para que en ejercicio de sus competencias constitucionales y legales, tramite y decida la accion de tutela instaurada por el senor Fredy Plutarco Sanchez Palacios contra la Universidad de Pamplona.
  2. Informese esta decision, ademas, a los Juzgados 14 Civil Municipal y 4deg Penal del Circuito de Bucaramanga y
  3. Primero. Promiscuo de Familia de Pamplona.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.